tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22657443.post5313403728990041648..comments2023-12-31T03:18:37.403-06:00Comments on "E pur si muove!": A Libertarian Argument for Drug Prohibition?Lester Hunthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14746157071827337723noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22657443.post-25011109909484106762011-07-15T14:25:50.727-05:002011-07-15T14:25:50.727-05:00???
If you believe we need more welfare state p...??? <br /><br />If you believe we need more welfare state programs, you are a welfare statist. What's wrong with that? Do you have a better name for it? Is that your point? I'm open to suggestions.Lester Hunthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14746157071827337723noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22657443.post-75347240571417486772011-07-15T14:18:52.601-05:002011-07-15T14:18:52.601-05:00"most of the people I've known who use dr..."most of the people I've known who use drugs are welfare statists, like Greenwald himself"<br /><br />i was trying to follow the premise of your argument and then i saw it lead go this absurdly strange claim. <br />What kind of drugs are you talking about? If you believe in certian social programs you become a 'welfare statist' ? that's awfully closed minded and lock step of you.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10479480243383968010noreply@blogger.com